Evaluation of cross-protection between O1 Manisa and O1 Campos in cattle vaccinated with foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine incorporating different payloads of inactivated O1 Manisa antigen

Serology is used to predict vaccine induced protection against challenge with a heterologous strain of the same serotype of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). To evaluate the accuracy of such predictions, we compared the protection afforded to cattle vaccinated with the O(1) Manisa strain of FMDV against challenge with either a homologous (O(1) Manisa) or a heterologous strain (O(1) Campos). Serology by virus neutralization test (VNT) using O(1) Manisa antiserum predicted an acceptable protection against such a challenge. Two experiments were carried out to compare the results for consistency. A total of 78 nave cattle were vaccinated with different antigen payloads (60-0.94 mu g) of O(1) Manisa. They were challenged by intradermolingual inoculation with live FMDV, either O(1) Manisa or O(1) Campos. Unvaccinated nave control cattle (n=20) were also challenged with either the O(1) Manisa or O(1) Campos viruses and all developed generalized FMD. The protection results for the vaccinated cattle revealed that higher payloads of O(1) Manisa vaccine were needed to protect against heterologous challenge compared to that for homologous challenge. The 50% protective dose (PD(50)) values for the vaccine in experiments 1 and 2 were found to be 28.78 and 9.44 for the homologous challenge and 3.98 and 5.01 for heterologous challenge. Furthermore, protection against O(1) Campos required a higher level of vaccine-induced antibody against this virus compared to the level of O(1) Manisa neutralizing antibody associated with protection against homologous challenge. The 50% protective level of in vitro neutralizing antibody was found to be log(10) 1.827 for O(1) Campos and log(10) 0.954 for O(1) Manisa based on O(1) Manisa based virus neutralization test.

Trim content

® The Pirbright Institute 2020 | A company limited by guarantee, registered in England no. 559784. The Institute is also a registered charity.